Friday, December 05, 2008
Register
  Search
Login
 
  :: ::  
 
 Sign Up! Minimize
Simply sign up above to post in the forums!

 Print   
 
 
 Hikaru's Forums Minimize
 
  HikaruNakamura.com  Chess  Openings  The Nimzo-Larsen attack:
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 1/27/2008 7:40 PM
  FirebrandX
13 posts
Club Champ


The Nimzo-Larsen attack: 
Modified By FirebrandX  on 1/27/2008 5:43:44 PM)

I've had a love-hate relationship with playing this opening. Often very fun in blitz, I find its not so great in tournament games. My problem is shaking the bad habit of playing it!

There are two flavors of the Nimzo-Larsen attack. The first being 1.Nf3 followed by 2.b3. In this version, you usually see white playing a reversed Nimzo-Indian. I've had a lot of fun getting in funky moves like Rf1-to-f3-to-g3 and applying hard pressure on black's kingside. The downside is if your attack fizzles, black gets better chances in the middle of the board.

The other flavor (which is the one I most often play) is the 1.b3 followed by 2. Bg2. This one is a bit more double edged in that you invite black to play an e5-Nc6-d5 formation, where you attempt to attack on the flanks with e3-Bb5-f4. I've played countless blitz games where black thinks its okay to play exf4, but then I quickly play Bxg7! and then immediately play Kf1 when black counters with Qh4+. At this point white is winning so long as trade-downs are carefully negotiated.

The downside to the Nimzo-Larsen is when black decides not to play along and instead sets up stodgy formations like d6-e5-Nf6-Nc6, or c6-d5. This what I often face in tournaments, and its very hard to get an advantage if any is to be had at this point.

At any rate, I just came back from a G30 swiss tournament and went undefeated. Here was my favorite game I played from today, which I employed the Nimzo-Larsen for an easy win:

 

1.b3 Nf6 2.Bb2 d5 3.Nf3 e6 4.e3 a6 5.d4 c5 6.Bd3 Nc6 7.0–0 Qb6 8.Nbd2 c4 9.Be2 Bb4 10.c3 Bd6 11.Qc2 cxb3 12.axb3 e5 13.dxe5 Bxe5 14.Nxe5 Nxe5 15.c4 Qc7 16.Qc3 Neg4 17.Bxg4 Nxg4 18.Nf3 Be6 19.Qxg7 0–0–0 20.cxd5 Bf5 21.Rac1 Qxc1 22.Rxc1+ Kb8 23.Qxh8 Rxh8 24.Bxh8 Be4 25.d6 Bc6 26.Bg7 f6 27.h3 Bxf3 28.gxf3 Ne5 29.Bxf6 Nc6 30.Rxc6 bxc6 1-0

 

Of special note for me is how I played fundamental trade-downs once I had the winning advantage. Moves like 23. Qxh8 were not technically the best possible moves, but they ensured the safest winning advantage whilst giving black the least amount of hope for a swindle attack. 

 

 

 

 

 

 
New Post 9/24/2008 9:57 AM
  Chessam
1 posts
Patzer


Re: The Nimzo-Larsen attack: 

I was wondering about this -- I have a friend who plays the Larsen attack against me consistently as white, mainly because it's the only way he's found to consistently play a tough game against me.  I'd like to deprive him of this little resource in some convincing fashion.

I don't think it's because he's taken me out of book.  My book knowledge is okay, but not spectacular enough where it would make a difference.  I usually do well trying to attack him aggressively.

 

Incidentally, nice game Firebrand.  I think the queen for both rooks, especially when his queen is already off the board, is a perfectly worthwhile trade.  I'm just not sure why he ever let you take the g7 pawn to begin with.

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  HikaruNakamura.com  Chess  Openings  The Nimzo-Larsen attack:

 Print   
 
   
Terms Of Use - Privacy Statement - Copyright 2008 HikaruNakamura.com